|
Heads up! Our parent watchdogs have scanned the upcoming agenda for ROGERS ISD. We found 5 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Voting on Secret Policy Changes
The board is voting to approve changes to a long list of policies identified only by bureaucratic codes (FDA, EIC, BE, etc.) under Item 6.g. The agenda provides no explanation of what these policies are or what is being changed, preventing any meaningful public review before the vote. These codes often govern sensitive topics like curriculum, library books, and student health.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Rogers ISD Board. ‘I demand Item 6.g be tabled until the full text of the proposed policy changes to FDA, EIC, BE, EHBD, CH, FNCE, FM, FD, and EIA are made public with a red-lined summary for parental review. Do not vote on secret policies.’ We advise members to find board contact information on the district’s official website.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Loss of Parental Oversight
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
The ‘Blank Check’ Policy Vote
Under Item 6.f, the board is scheduled to vote on ‘Policy Update 127’ without providing the text of the policy or any description of its purpose. This vague title could conceal anything from minor administrative changes to major shifts in student discipline or curriculum. Voting on an undefined policy is a violation of public trust.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Rogers ISD Board. ‘What is Policy Update 127? I demand Item 6.f be pulled from the agenda until the full text is posted for public review. We will not accept a vote on a mystery policy.’ We advise members to find board contact information on the district’s official website.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Loss of Transparency
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
New Student Discipline Rules Hidden from Parents
The board is voting to approve the new Student Code of Conduct (Item 6.c), but the document itself has not been attached to the public agenda. This code dictates the rules for discipline, bullying, and student behavior. It could contain new language on ‘restorative practices’ that reduce consequences for bad behavior, or redefine harassment to include speech related to gender identity, all without parental review.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Rogers ISD Board. ‘Post the proposed Student Code of Conduct (Item 6.c) immediately. Parents have a right to review the discipline policies that will govern our children before you vote on them.’ We advise members to find board contact information on the district’s official website.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Erosion of Discipline and Parental Authority
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Outside Group Gaining Access to Students
The board is voting on a contract for an ‘Autism Grant’ through a ‘Central Texas Regional Shared Services Arrangement’ (Item 6.a). These regional arrangements can act as a pipeline for unvetted curriculum and consultants, often with data-sharing requirements. The district has not provided the contract for public review, so parents cannot see what services are being offered or what strings are attached.
Recommended Action Plan
OPT-OUT ALERT: Email the Rogers ISD Board. ‘Regarding Item 6.a, who is the vendor for the Innovative Services Autism Grant? Will this program involve student surveys or data collection? Please provide the contract and clarify the parental opt-out process before the vote.’ We advise members to find board contact information on the district’s official website.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Potential for Student Data Mining and Ideological Services
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 4) |
|
Opening the Door to Federal Overreach
The administration is presenting its ‘State & Federal Grants Manual’ (Item 5.d). While not a vote, this document outlines the rules the district will follow to get money from the government. These grants often come with strings attached, mandating specific DEI, SEL, or ‘mental health’ programs that bypass local control and parental consent. This is a signal of the district’s intent to pursue these funds.
Recommended Action Plan
Monitor: This isn’t a vote, but it’s a warning shot. Parents should watch for future grant applications that use this manual as justification for adopting controversial programs. Track for future scope creep.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Future ‘Strings-Attached’ Federal Funding
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends. Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |