|
Heads up! Our parent watchdogs have scanned the upcoming agenda for Orange County Schools. We found 6 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Over $1.3M in Federal Grants with Ideological Strings
The board is set to approve a consolidated application for over $1.3 million in federal Title I, II, III, and IV grants. The district’s justification is filled with ‘equity’ language, suggesting this money comes with requirements to implement specific social programming rather than focusing on core academics.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: This item (J.5) is on the Consent Agenda. Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Pull Item J.5 from the Consent Agenda for a full public discussion. Parents deserve to know exactly what ideological commitments are tied to the $1.3M in federal funds before you vote.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: $1,363,469 (Federal Strings Attached)
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Strategic Plan Cites ‘Equitable Outcomes’ for Discipline
The final report on the district’s strategic plan highlights ‘tiered supportive measures’ and ‘equitable outcomes’ for student discipline. This is often code for abandoning equal standards of conduct in favor of race-based ‘restorative practices’ that can make classrooms less safe.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: The report (Item III.B) is an information item, but the underlying policies are real. Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘What specific changes to the student code of conduct have been made under the goal of ‘equitable outcomes’? Provide the data on how these policies have impacted classroom safety and disciplinary incidents.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Classroom Safety
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
District to Lease Building to ‘Restorative Practices’ Group
The board plans to approve a lease agreement with Boomerang Youth, Inc., an outside organization that promotes ‘restorative practices.’ This creates a formal partnership that brings a non-academic, ideological approach to behavior and discipline directly into the district’s sphere of influence.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Regarding Item J.8, what oversight will the district have on the programs run by Boomerang Youth, Inc.? Will students be referred to this group without full parental consent? This item must be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Outsourcing Discipline Policy
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
$180k Contract for International Teacher Recruitment
The district is spending $179,590 with ‘Participate Learning’ to recruit international teachers, with the stated ‘Equity Impact’ of hiring ‘Diverse and qualified employees.’ These recruitment firms can act as ideological gatekeepers, prioritizing a candidate’s social views over their teaching ability.
Recommended Action Plan
ASK QUESTIONS: Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Regarding the $180k Participate Learning contract (Item J.9.2), what are the screening criteria used to select teachers? Are their views on parental rights, gender ideology, and critical race theory part of the evaluation?’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: $179,590
|
| 👀 MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
Personnel Report Hidden in Consent Agenda
The ‘Personnel Report and Recommendations’ is buried in the consent agenda, a tactic often used to approve controversial hires like DEI officers without public discussion. The report itself is not attached, leaving parents completely in the dark about who is being hired to interact with their children.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘The Personnel Report (Item J.2) must be pulled from the Consent Agenda. The full list of new hires and their positions should be made public before any vote is taken.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Lack of Transparency
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 3) |
|
Public Comment Policy Limits Parent Voice
The board’s public comment policy (2310) limits total comment time to 90 minutes and explicitly states the board will not have a discussion with any speaker. This structure is designed to minimize board accountability and prevent parents from engaging in a real dialogue about their concerns.
Recommended Action Plan
Monitor: This is an existing policy, not a new vote. Be aware of these restrictive rules when signing up to speak. Future advocacy should focus on demanding the board remove the 90-minute cap and allow for board responses to public questions.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Reduced Board Oversight
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends. Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |