|
We reviewed the upcoming agenda for Central Bucks SD and identified 5 items with potential legal exposure ahead of the vote.
| HIGH VIABILITY (LEVEL 8) |
|
Policies Extending Discipline to Off-Campus Speech
The district is considering two policies, Policy 218 (Student Discipline) and Policy 829 (Electronic Devices), that extend disciplinary authority to off-campus student conduct. The policies use broad language, including conduct that ‘materially and substantially disrupts’ school operations, creating potential for unconstitutional regulation of student speech outside of school.
Intake Action
PRE-VOTE ACTION: Items 4.F and 4.H are first reads. Send a pre-adoption legal notice to the Board before the second reading, outlining the constitutional limits on regulating off-campus speech. Preserve the agenda packet and proposed policy texts.
⚖️ Legal Hook: First Amendment – Off-Campus Student Speech
|
| HIGH VIABILITY (LEVEL 8) |
|
Ban on Student Recording at School Events
Proposed Policy 829.1 prohibits students from taking photographs or recording audio/video ‘at any time during the school day or at any school-sponsored event that is not open to the general public’ without prior written consent. This policy is a broad prior restraint on student speech and press rights, potentially chilling their ability to document events of public interest.
Intake Action
PRE-VOTE ACTION: Item 4.I is a first read. Send a pre-adoption legal notice to the Board before the second reading, identifying the policy as an unconstitutional prior restraint on student speech. Preserve the agenda packet and proposed policy text.
⚖️ Legal Hook: First Amendment – Prior Restraint
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 6) |
|
Graduation Speaker Selection Process
The district is considering Policy 214, which establishes a graduation speaker selection process involving an audition and ‘principal review for compliance with Board policy, law and graduation procedures.’ This creates a prior restraint mechanism that could be used for viewpoint discrimination against student speech, including religious expression.
Intake Action
CALENDAR: Item 4.B is a first read. Track for second reading and adoption. If adopted, monitor implementation for evidence of viewpoint discrimination in speaker selection.
⚖️ Legal Hook: First Amendment – Viewpoint Discrimination
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
Proposed Changes to Student Expression Policy
October 8, 2026 meeting minutes confirm the Policy Committee is drafting new language for Policy 220 to restrict student speech that interferes with another student’s ‘right to dignity’. Such vague and subjective standards create a risk of unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and chilling of protected speech.
Intake Action
CALENDAR: Track future Policy Committee agendas for the first read of the revised Policy 220. The discussion in the 10/8/2026 minutes suggests a high likelihood of unconstitutionally vague or overbroad speech restrictions.
⚖️ Legal Hook: First Amendment – Student Speech
|
|
✅ Precedent to Preserve
Adopted language worth preserving as precedent.
|
| Strong Precedent (LEVEL 7) |
|
Policy on Parental Notification for Police Contact
The October 8 meeting report indicates the committee discussed adding language to Policy 224 to require parental notification before police contact with students. This policy is now on the agenda for a second read, suggesting the protective language may be included, which would be a significant protection for parental rights.
How to Preserve It
PULL THE DOCUMENT: The text for Item 5.B, Policy 224, was not available. Retrieve the attachment from the official agenda link before the vote. If it contains strong parental notification language for police interviews, preserve the adopted text and vote count as a model policy.
✅ Why It Matters: Parental Rights – 14th Am. Due Process
|
|
|
“Contending in the courts of man, in reverence for the courts of God.”
Alliance Defending Freedom is the world’s largest legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, the sanctity of life, parental rights, and God’s design for marriage and family.
Alliance Defending Freedom |