|
Heads up! Our parent watchdogs have scanned the upcoming agenda for NORTH BABYLON UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT. We found 6 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
New Code of Conduct Replaces Discipline with Ideology
The district is proposing a new Code of Conduct that replaces traditional discipline with ideological concepts like “Restorative Justice” and “social and emotional growth.” The policy also inserts “gender identity and expression” as a protected category in student rights and the dress code, which could lead to conflicts with parental values and undermine discipline at home.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is a First Reading, our best chance to stop it. Email the Board of Education (contact info on district website): ‘I oppose the ideological language in the proposed Code of Conduct, Policy 5300. Discipline should not be replaced with Restorative Justice, and schools should not codify gender ideology. Vote NO.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Undermining Parental Discipline
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
School ‘Improvement’ Plans Embed Student Monitoring
Buried in the consent agenda, the ‘School Comprehensive Education Plans’ for Woods Road and DeLuca Elementary formalize the use of a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS). MTSS is often used to collect non-academic data on students for behavioral interventions without full parental consent.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Contact the District Office (see the Official Agenda link) and demand that items 9.M and 9.N be pulled from the Omnibus Motion for a separate discussion and vote. Ask the board: ‘What specific non-academic data will be collected on students under the MTSS framework, and how can parents opt out?’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Your Child’s Data
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Vague Title — Manual Review Required
The board is set to approve the “District Comprehensive Improvement Plan” as part of a bundled vote, but the plan itself was not included in the public agenda packet. This is a major strategic document that dictates district priorities, and it’s being passed without public review.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file ‘NBSD_2026-27_DCIP2 (1).pdf’ attached in the Official Agenda (linked above) to see what ideological mandates or spending priorities are hidden in this plan. Demand the board pull item 9.L from the consent agenda for a full presentation.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Reduced Board Oversight
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
Final Vote on Parental Engagement Policy with Missing Text
The board is holding a final vote to adopt a new “Parent and Family Engagement” policy (1900), but the main policy document was not included in the agenda packet. While the attached exhibits seem standard, the core policy language that defines parental rights is missing and must be reviewed before the vote.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file ‘1900 PARENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT.docx’ attached in the Official Agenda (linked above) to confirm whether it contains sensitive policy changes. Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Do not hold a final vote on Policy 1900 until the full text is made available for public review.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Your Parental Rights
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
Vague Contract with Controversial Special Ed Provider
The board plans to approve a contract with the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, a provider known for using controversial methods for students with disabilities. The contract details are not attached to the agenda, preventing public review before the vote.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file ‘Judge Rotenberg Educational Center 26-27 Contract.pdf’ attached in the Official Agenda (linked above) to confirm the services and costs. Email the Board of Education (contact info on district website): ‘Item 9.H must be pulled from the consent agenda. Parents deserve a public discussion about the district’s relationship with the controversial Judge Rotenberg Center.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Undisclosed
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Board to Discuss Vague “Do No Harm Policy”
The board has scheduled a discussion on a “Do No Harm Policy,” but has not provided any text or details. This phrase is sometimes used to justify policies that withhold information from parents, particularly regarding a child’s gender identity at school, under the guise of protecting the child.
Recommended Action Plan
ATTEND & REPORT: We need moms in the room for this discussion (Item 10.A) to take notes and report back on what is said. If the board proposes a policy that allows secrets to be kept from parents, we need to be ready to fight it at the first reading.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Parental Notification Rights
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends. Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |