|
We reviewed the upcoming agenda for Libertyville SD 70 and identified 5 items with potential legal exposure ahead of the vote.
| HIGH VIABILITY (LEVEL 7) |
|
First Reading of Equal Educational Opportunities Policy
The board is considering a first reading of Policy 7:10, ‘Equal Educational Opportunities.’ These policies often define non-discrimination on the basis of sex and gender identity, which can create exposure under Title IX regarding sex-separated facilities and under the 14th Amendment regarding parental rights if they enable social transition without parental consent.
Intake Action
PULL THE DOCUMENT: Retrieve the proposed text for Policy 7:10 under agenda item 5 from the official agenda link or via a records request before the vote. The policy’s definitions of ‘sex’ and ‘gender identity’ are critical to assess Title IX and parental rights exposure.
⚖️ Legal Hook: Title IX – Sex-Separated Facilities
|
| HIGH VIABILITY (LEVEL 7) |
|
First Reading of Student Records Policy Update
The board is reviewing Policy 7:340, ‘Student Records.’ Updates to these policies can create parental rights exposure by codifying the creation of separate ‘unofficial’ records to document a student’s social transition, such as a new name or pronouns, while concealing this information from parents who review ‘official’ records.
Intake Action
PULL THE DOCUMENT: Retrieve the proposed text for Policy 7:340 under agenda item 5 from the official agenda link or via a records request. Scrutinize language regarding unofficial records, preferred names, and parental access to confirm if it allows for concealment of information.
⚖️ Legal Hook: Parental Rights – 14th Am. Due Process
|
| HIGH VIABILITY (LEVEL 7) |
|
First Reading of Employee Conduct and Harassment Policies
The board is reviewing several employee policies under item 5, including 5:20 (‘Workplace Harassment Prohibited’) and 5:120 (‘Employee Ethics; Code of Professional Conduct’). These policies may create compelled speech issues for staff if they mandate the use of preferred pronouns or require affirmation of specific ideological views on gender, with non-compliance defined as harassment or unprofessional conduct.
Intake Action
PULL THE DOCUMENTS: Retrieve the proposed text for Policies 5:20 and 5:120 from the official agenda link or via a records request. Analyze the definitions of ‘harassment’ and ‘unprofessional conduct’ for language that could be used to compel employee speech.
⚖️ Legal Hook: First Amendment – Compelled Speech
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 6) |
|
First Reading of Facility Use Policy
The board is holding a first reading of Policy 8:20, ‘Community Use of School Facilities.’ Such policies can create First Amendment exposure if they discriminate against religious groups by denying access, charging differential fees, or imposing content-based restrictions not applied to secular community groups.
Intake Action
PULL THE DOCUMENT: Retrieve the proposed text for Policy 8:20 under agenda item 5 from the official agenda link or via a records request. Review the fee schedule and access criteria to ensure religious organizations are treated on par with other non-profit community groups.
⚖️ Legal Hook: First Amendment – Free Exercise
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 4) |
|
Vague Agenda Item for Policy Approval
Agenda Item 3, ‘Discuss Policy for Approval,’ provides no information about which policy is being considered for final approval. This lack of specificity fails to provide adequate public notice of the board’s intended action, potentially violating state open meetings laws.
Intake Action
MONITOR & RECORD: An attorney or paralegal should monitor the meeting for Item 3 to identify the specific policy being approved. If a controversial policy is adopted under this vague item, the procedural defect may be relevant to a future challenge.
⚖️ Legal Hook: State Open Meetings Act
|
|
|
“Contending in the courts of man, in reverence for the courts of God.”
Alliance Defending Freedom is the world’s largest legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, the sanctity of life, parental rights, and God’s design for marriage and family.
Alliance Defending Freedom |