|
Heads up! We have scanned the upcoming agenda for Ridgefield School District. We found 7 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Federal Grants Bring Ideological Strings
Item K.12 shows the Board accepting $562,636 in federal ESEA grants (Title I, II, III, and IV). This federal money rarely comes without strings, often requiring the district to adopt specific ‘equity’ initiatives, SEL programs, or invasive student data collection systems that are not transparent to parents.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board (contact info on the district website): ‘Regarding Consent Item K.12, what specific programmatic, curriculum, or data-sharing requirements are attached to the ESEA grants? The public deserves to know the full cost of accepting this federal money before you vote.’
💰 Impact: $562,636 (Federal Strings Attached)
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
District Hires ‘Attendance Family Liaisons’ to Monitor Families
Item O.9 approves six ‘Attendance Family Liaisons’ at a cost of $30,000, paid for with federal Title I funds. This creates a new layer of administration focused on ‘chronic absenteeism,’ which can lead to intrusive surveillance of families, including home visits, without addressing the root causes of why students may miss school.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is government overreach into the home. Sign up for public comment to oppose Item O.9. Email the Board (contact info on the district website): ‘Vote NO on the Attendance Family Liaisons. We do not need district employees monitoring families.’
💰 Impact: Family Surveillance
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
District Approving ‘Anti-Bullying’ Self-Assessment
Under items D.1 and N.2, the Board will discuss and approve its ‘School Self-Assessment for Determining Grades under the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act.’ These state-mandated assessments are often used as a backdoor to push controversial gender ideology, pronoun policies, and other social agendas into schools under the cover of ‘safety’ and ‘anti-bullying.’
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board (contact info on the district website): ‘Regarding Item N.2, parents demand that the full text of the Anti-Bullying Self-Assessment and its scoring rubric be posted publicly before any vote. We must see the criteria you are using to grade our schools.’
💰 Impact: Classroom Social Engineering
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
More Unvetted Screen Time Software in Classrooms
Item K.8 approves spending for an ‘IXL Live Workshop.’ IXL is a student-facing educational software program that increases screen time, often replacing direct instruction from a teacher. The Board has not provided any independent, non-vendor-supplied evidence that this program produces meaningful academic gains.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND PROOF: Email the Board (contact info on the district website): ‘Before approving more spending on IXL under Item K.8, please provide the public with independent evidence of its academic effectiveness and a report on the total daily screen time it requires of students. Our children need teachers, not more apps.’
💰 Impact: More Student Screen Time
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Crowdfunding Site Opens Door to Unvetted Classroom Materials
Under item K.11, the Board is authorizing teachers to use ‘DonorsChoose,’ a crowdfunding website, to solicit materials for their classrooms. This creates a significant loophole, allowing ideologically-motivated books and supplies to enter the classroom while bypassing the district’s official curriculum review process and parental oversight.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND OVERSIGHT: Email the Board (contact info on the district website): ‘Regarding Consent Item K.11, what is the specific, transparent process for vetting all materials that enter a classroom via DonorsChoose? Parental rights to review curriculum must not be bypassed by online fundraising.’
💰 Impact: Bypassing Parental Review
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
External Group to Conduct Student Vision Screenings
Item N.4 approves The Lions Club to conduct vision screenings for students in multiple schools. While well-intentioned, this involves an outside organization performing a health service on children. Parents must be clearly informed about what data is collected, where it is stored, and be required to provide explicit opt-in consent.
Recommended Action Plan
OPT-OUT ALERT: Email the Board (contact info on the district website): ‘Regarding Item N.4, please confirm that the Lions Club vision screenings are strictly opt-in with affirmative parental consent, and clarify the district’s data privacy policy for health information collected by third parties.’
💰 Impact: Your Child’s Health Data
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 4) |
|
Vague Title — Manual Review Required
Item P.1 is the first reading of revised Policy #8561, ‘Procurement Procedures for School Nutrition Programs.’ The actual text of the policy change was not included in the publicly available agenda packet, making it impossible to review for hidden language or concerning changes.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file attached to Item P.1 in the Official Agenda (linked above) to confirm whether it contains sensitive policy changes. The district must not vote on policies the public cannot see.
💰 Impact: Undisclosed Policy Change
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
Moms for Liberty is the nation’s largest grassroots organization fighting for parental rights. Through national members and local chapters, our work ensures parents, not the government or radical activists, make the decisions concerning the upbringing and education of their children.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |