|
Heads up! We have scanned the upcoming agenda for Gilbert Unified District (4239). We found 6 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 10) |
|
Policy Allows State to Interrogate Your Child Without Your Knowledge
Under proposed Policy 5-402, the school would be authorized to allow Department of Child Safety (DCS) agents to interview your child on campus without notifying you. The policy creates loopholes that allow the school to keep parents in the dark if an investigator claims parental notification would ‘impede the investigation.’ This formalizes a process for separating you from your child at a critical moment.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is a critical threat. Email the Gilbert Unified Governing Board (see district website for contacts): ‘I am your constituent, and I demand you vote NO on Policy 5-402. You have no right to allow a government agent to interrogate my child without my knowledge and consent.’
💰 Impact: Your Right to Consent
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
District to Spend $700,000 on New Science Curriculum and EdTech
The board is set to approve a $700,000 annual contract for new 7th-8th grade science curriculum from vendors including Imagine Learning and HMH Company. This introduces significant new digital screen time and new teaching materials that parents have not been given a chance to review. The district has not provided independent evidence that these expensive programs improve academic outcomes.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Governing Board (see district website for contacts): ‘Before you vote on Item 9.02, I demand you publish the proposed curriculum for public review and provide independent, non-vendor-funded studies proving this $700,000 expense will raise test scores. What is the total daily screen time this new software will add?’
💰 Impact: $700,000
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
New Policy Slashes Parent Speaking Time at Board Meetings
The board is voting on Policy 1-302, which would automatically reduce public comment time based on the number of speakers. If more than 30 parents show up to speak, each person is limited to just one minute. This is a deliberate tactic to silence parental opposition on controversial issues when turnout is highest.
Recommended Action Plan
PROTECT PUBLIC COMMENT: Email the Governing Board (see district website for contacts): ‘Regarding Item 2.02, I urge you to strike the provision that automatically reduces speaking time. Silencing parents who show up to participate is an unacceptable governance practice.’
💰 Impact: Your Voice
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
Mysterious ‘Prop 320’ Financial Presentation Hidden from Public
The agenda lists a ‘Prop 320 Presentation’ under item 5.03, but the actual presentation file is not included in the public documents. ‘Prop’ often signals a bond or tax levy, meaning the board may be planning to ask taxpayers for more money. Hiding the details of a major financial proposal until the meeting prevents public scrutiny.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file for Item 5.03 attached in the Official Agenda (linked above) to confirm whether it contains a new bond, levy, or other tax increase. If so, this is a major financial action being advanced with minimal transparency.
💰 Impact: Potential Tax Increase
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
Mandatory Reporting Policy Creates Loophole to Keep Parents in the Dark
The proposed Mandatory Reporting policy (4-204) includes a clause allowing the school to avoid notifying a parent about a suspected criminal offense against their child. If an investigator decides that telling the parent would ‘impede a law enforcement or Department of Child Safety investigation,’ the school can remain silent. This prioritizes the state’s investigation over a parent’s right to know what is happening to their child.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND CLARITY: Email the Governing Board (see district website for contacts): ‘Regarding Policy 4-204, under what specific circumstances would you hide information from a parent about their own child’s safety? The ‘impede an investigation’ clause is too vague and must be removed to protect parental rights.’
💰 Impact: Parental Notification
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 4) |
|
District Expands Use of Surveillance Cameras on Campus
Policy 3-401.D updates the district’s authority to use surveillance cameras in school buildings, on buses, and on school grounds. While framed as a safety measure, this normalizes constant monitoring of students. The policy also requires parents to file a formal ‘Public Record Request’ to view footage, creating a bureaucratic barrier for parents who want to see incidents involving their own child.
Recommended Action Plan
ASK THE BOARD: Email the Governing Board (see district website for contacts): ‘Regarding Item 2.03, what is the process for a parent to immediately review camera footage of an incident involving their own child? A lengthy Public Records Request process is not acceptable for safety and disciplinary matters.’
💰 Impact: Student Privacy
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
Moms for Liberty is the nation’s largest grassroots organization fighting for parental rights. Through national members and local chapters, our work ensures parents, not the government or radical activists, make the decisions concerning the upbringing and education of their children.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |