|
Heads up! We have scanned the upcoming agenda for Lexington City Schools. We found 7 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Vague Title β Manual Review Required
The board is holding a ‘First Read’ on the NCSBA Policy Series 8000, which typically governs students. These model policies from the state school board association often include radical gender identity, pronoun, and bathroom rules that deliberately cut parents out of the loop.
Recommended Action Plan
URGENT-INVESTIGATE: Open file ‘8000 10132026 (1st Read) (1).pdf’ in the official agenda (linked above). The NCSBA 8000 series is a known vehicle for policies that harm children and violate parental rights. We must see the text of Item 7.B before this ‘First Read’ happens.
π° Impact: Your Right to Parent
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Vague Title β Manual Review Required
The board is voting to approve School Improvement Plans (SIPs) for the district, but the plans themselves are not included in the public agenda packet. SIPs are frequently used to sneak ‘equity,’ ‘anti-racism,’ and Social Emotional Learning (SEL) initiatives into schools under the guise of academic goals.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the ‘SIP BOE.pdf’ file for Item 5.F attached in the Official Agenda (linked above). Confirm these plans are focused on core academics like reading and math, not social engineering. Email the Board to demand the plans be made public and debated, not hidden in a consent vote.
π° Impact: Hidden DEI/SEL Goals
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Vague Title β Manual Review Required
The board is conducting a ‘First Read’ of the NCSBA Policy Series 9000, which covers parent and community relations. While this sounds good, these policies can be used to redefine ‘parental involvement’ as parental compliance with the school’s agenda, rather than genuine oversight.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open file ‘900010132026 (1st Read).pdf’ for Item 7.C in the official agenda. We need to confirm if these policies strengthen parental rights or create new barriers for parents who question the district.
π° Impact: Redefining Parental Rights
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
Undisclosed Student Placements on Consent Agenda
The board is voting on ‘Student Placements’ with zero public information provided. This opaque item, hidden on the consent agenda, prevents parents from understanding what criteria are being used to move children between programs or schools.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Contact the District Office (see the Official Agenda link): ‘I demand Consent Item 5.G, ‘Student Placements,’ be pulled from the Consent Agenda for a separate discussion and vote. Parents deserve to know what this item entails.’
π° Impact: Lack of Transparency
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Board Policy Limits Parent Voices
Board Policy 1.6.1.3, detailed in the agenda, caps the total time for all public comments at just 30 minutes per meeting. This allows the board to silence parents on controversial issues by simply letting the clock run out, even if dozens of citizens have signed up to speak.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TO BE HEARD: Contact the Board (see the Official Agenda link): ‘Policy 1.6.1.3’s 30-minute total cap on public comment is an unacceptable restriction on parental rights. We demand this arbitrary cap be removed to ensure every citizen has a voice.’
π° Impact: Limited Parent Voice
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Vague Title β Manual Review Required
The board is voting to approve ‘Overnight Field Trip Requests’ without providing any details on the destination, purpose, cost, or chaperones. Parents cannot provide informed consent for their children’s safety and travel without this basic information.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: The agenda lists ‘Overnight Field Trip Requests’ under Item 5.D with no attached files. Email the Board and demand they publish the destination, purpose, and chaperone list for each trip before the vote.
π° Impact: Your Child’s Safety
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
District Partners with ‘At-Risk’ Student Group
The board is approving an agreement with Communities in Schools (CIS), a group that provides ‘mentoring and support’ for ‘at-risk students’. These outside groups often serve as a pipeline for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and student data collection, operating outside of direct parental oversight.
Recommended Action Plan
ASK QUESTIONS: Contact the Board (see the Official Agenda link): ‘Regarding Item 5.A, what specific student data will be shared with Communities in Schools, and what is the parental notification and opt-out process for their services?’
π° Impact: Student Data & Influence
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
Moms for Liberty is the nationβs largest grassroots organization fighting for parental rights. Through national members and local chapters, our work ensures parents, not the government or radical activists, make the decisions concerning the upbringing and education of their children.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |