|
Heads up! We have scanned the upcoming agenda for BAY. We found 4 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Vague ‘Neola Policy Updates’ Could Hide Parental Rights Changes
The board is voting to approve unspecified policy updates from Neola, a national vendor. These boilerplate updates often contain controversial changes to parental notification, gender identity, and student discipline policies that are slipped in without public discussion.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE & DEMAND DELAY: The agenda provides no text for the ‘Neola Policy Updates’ in Item 12.A. Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘I demand the vote on Item 12.A be postponed until the full text of all proposed Neola policy changes is posted publicly for a 30-day parent review period.’
💰 Impact: Eroded Parental Rights
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
District Pushing Through New Job Descriptions Without Public Review
The board is voting on ‘New/Revised Job Descriptions’, but the documents are not attached to the public agenda. This is a common tactic to create and fund positions for ideological initiatives like DEI or SEL without parental scrutiny.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: The agenda does not include the text for the ‘New/Revised Job Descriptions’ in Item 17.A. Contact the District Office (see the Official Agenda link): ‘Parents have a right to know what new positions their tax dollars are funding. Post the full text of all job descriptions in Item 17.A immediately and pull it from the agenda for a separate vote.’
💰 Impact: Taxpayer-Funded Activists
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
District to Approve ‘Edmentum’ Tutoring Software
The board is approving ‘Edmentum High Impact Tutoring,’ a student-facing software program. The district has not provided any independent, non-vendor evidence that this program improves academic outcomes, nor has it disclosed how much additional daily screen time this will mean for students.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND EVIDENCE: Before voting on Item 18.A, the Board must answer two questions for parents. Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Please publish the independent, non-vendor-funded studies proving Edmentum’s effectiveness and state the expected daily screen time per student before approving Item 18.A. Our children are not beta-testers for software companies.’
💰 Impact: More Screen Time
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
Vague ‘Professional Learning’ Could Be Teacher Indoctrination
The board is voting to approve ‘Professional Learning Support’ with no details, vendor names, or costs provided. This is a common way to fund controversial teacher training on topics like Critical Race Theory, gender ideology, or SEL without alerting parents.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: The agenda provides no details for ‘Professional Learning Support’ in Item 18.C. Contact the District Office (see the Official Agenda link): ‘What specific training, vendors, and materials are covered under Item 18.C, and what is the total cost? This item must be pulled from the agenda until these details are made public.’
💰 Impact: Undisclosed
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
Moms for Liberty is the nation’s largest grassroots organization fighting for parental rights. Through national members and local chapters, our work ensures parents, not the government or radical activists, make the decisions concerning the upbringing and education of their children.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |