|
Heads up! We have scanned the upcoming agenda for Grossmont Union High. We found 9 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 10) |
|
District Seeks ‘Community Schools’ Grant to Bring in Outside Services
The district is applying for a ‘Community Schools’ grant, which establishes on-campus resource centers that partner with outside agencies for ‘health and social services.’ These programs can become a backdoor for school-based clinics and data collection on families, all under the guise of the ‘whole child’ model.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is a major step toward the government co-parenting your child. Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Vote NO on the Community Schools grant application in Item T.5. Parents, not the school, are responsible for our children’s health and social services.’
💰 Impact: Bypassing Parental Consent
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 10) |
|
District to Place University Social Work Students in Schools
The district is approving an agreement to place San Diego State University social work students on our campuses for ‘service-learning experiences.’ This creates a pipeline for school-based mental health interventions that can occur without full parental knowledge or consent, viewing family life through a therapeutic lens.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This agreement puts future social workers between you and your child. Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Vote NO on the agreement with SDSU’s School of Social Work in Item V.5. Parents must be the primary authority on their children’s mental and emotional well-being.’
💰 Impact: Undermining Parental Authority
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Vague Title — Manual Review Required
The board is holding a second reading on Board Policy 6161.1, which governs how all instructional materials are selected and evaluated. This is a critical policy that determines parental review rights and the process for challenging inappropriate content in the classroom and library.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file ‘DRAFT BP 6161.1.pdf’ attached to Item N.2 in the Official Agenda (linked above). This policy is foundational to our rights; we must confirm it strengthens, not weakens, parental oversight.
💰 Impact: Weakened Parent Review
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
District Hiding $294k for ‘Educational Consultants’ on Consent Agenda
Buried in the consent agenda is a $294,317.33 line item for unspecified ‘Educational Consultants.’ This is a common tactic to fund DEI, SEL, or ‘anti-racism’ trainers without a public discussion on their qualifications or curriculum.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘I demand Item T.1 be pulled from the Consent Agenda for a separate discussion and roll-call vote. Who are these consultants and what are they teaching?’
💰 Impact: $294,317.33
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
District Seeks Grant to Share Student Data with National Database
The district wants to apply for the CAPP Bridge grant, which would connect student data, including ‘demographic information,’ with the National Student Clearinghouse. This expands the digital tracking of your child long after they leave the district, creating a permanent data trail without clear parental oversight.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND ANSWERS: Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Regarding Item T.7, what specific data points will be shared with the National Student Clearinghouse, and what is the parental opt-out process? Do not approve this grant without answering these questions publicly.’
💰 Impact: Your Child’s Privacy
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
District Caps Public Comment Time
The board is enforcing a policy that limits total public comment on any single agenda item to 20 minutes, and all public comment to 30 minutes total. This procedure can be used to shut down parent testimony on controversial topics once an arbitrary time limit is reached.
Recommended Action Plan
Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Regarding Item J.1, we demand that you suspend the 20-minute per-item and 30-minute total time limits on public comment. Parents will not be silenced by procedural games.’
💰 Impact: Your Voice Silenced
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
District Renews Student Spyware Without Competitive Bids
The board is renewing its contract for GoGuardian, a software that performs ‘classroom monitoring’ and ‘cloud filtering’ on student devices. The district is skipping the competitive bidding process, locking in a platform that monitors your child’s online activity.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board (contact info on district website): ‘Before renewing the GoGuardian contract under Item U.5, please publish the district’s full data privacy policy for this software and provide evidence that its use leads to academic gains, not just student surveillance.’
💰 Impact: Student Digital Privacy
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Vague Title — Manual Review Required
The board is voting on a second reading of unspecified ‘legal updates’ to Human Resources board policies. These types of updates can be used to insert new requirements for staff training on topics like DEI, implicit bias, or gender ideology.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the files ‘Human Resources Board Policies Memo.pdf’ and ‘Human Resources Policy Revisions.pdf’ attached to Item N.1 in the Official Agenda (linked above) to confirm whether they contain sensitive policy changes.
💰 Impact: Undisclosed Policy Changes
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
Vague Title — Manual Review Required
The board is ratifying a list of purchase orders and contracts totaling over $3.4 million. The vendors and services are not detailed in the agenda itself, potentially hiding spending on ideological consultants or controversial curriculum.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the files ‘Oct PO List.pdf’ and ‘Oct Contract List.pdf’ attached to Item Q.4 in the Official Agenda (linked above) to check for contracts with ideological vendors like Panorama, CASEL, or SPLC.
💰 Impact: $3.4 Million
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
Moms for Liberty is the nation’s largest grassroots organization fighting for parental rights. Through national members and local chapters, our work ensures parents, not the government or radical activists, make the decisions concerning the upbringing and education of their children.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |