|
Heads up! We have scanned the upcoming agenda for Vista Unified. We found 7 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 10) |
|
District Approving Multiple ‘Social-Emotional’ Vendor Contracts
Item 14.A on the Consent Calendar includes contracts with multiple ideological vendors. This includes a $24,420 contract for ‘Project Wayfinder,’ a known Social Emotional Learning (SEL) curriculum, and a $24,500 contract for ‘Project AWARE’ to provide ‘Emotional Literacy group sessions.’ Another contract with ‘Lifeline’ introduces ‘Alternatives to Detention’ and ‘Community Assessment Teams,’ which are restorative justice and student surveillance programs.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Email the Board (see official agenda for contacts): ‘I demand that the contracts with Project Wayfinder, Project AWARE, and Lifeline in Consent Item 14.A be pulled for a separate discussion and roll-call vote. Parents deserve to know why the district is spending money on social engineering instead of academics.’
💰 Impact: $48,920+
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 10) |
|
Board to Ratify $3.85 Million Contract with Unknown Vendor
Buried in the $10.4 million Purchase Order report (Item 8.A) is a massive $3,850,000 payment to ‘Kodely LLC’ for after-school programs. There is no information provided about this vendor or the specific services being rendered for this enormous sum of money. This lack of transparency on a multi-million dollar contract is a major red flag.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is an urgent financial issue. Sign up for public comment and email the Board (see official agenda for contacts): ‘Regarding Item 8.A, what services is Kodely LLC providing for $3.85 million? The Board must provide a detailed explanation and justification for this expense before ratifying this purchase order.’
💰 Impact: $3,850,000
|
| HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
District Spending Over $70,000 on Screen-Based Learning Software
The district plans to approve multiple contracts for student-facing educational software, including over $70,000 for ‘i-Ready’ and ‘Lexia’ in Items 8.A and 14.A. These programs increase student screen time, often replacing direct instruction from a teacher with adaptive software. The district has not provided independent evidence that these expensive programs produce meaningful academic gains.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND EVIDENCE: Email the Board (see official agenda for contacts): ‘Before approving the i-Ready and Lexia contracts in Items 8.A and 14.A, please publish the independent, non-vendor-funded evidence of their academic effectiveness and the total daily screen time these products add for a typical student. We must prioritize proven, teacher-led instruction.’
💰 Impact: $70,668+
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
Public Comment Time Limited by Board Rules
The meeting notice states that the total time for public comment on any single agenda item is limited to twenty minutes. This rule can be used to silence a large group of concerned parents on a controversial topic, as the board can simply cut off speakers after the 20-minute mark regardless of how many people are waiting to speak. This is a direct restriction on the community’s right to be heard.
Recommended Action Plan
DEFEND YOUR VOICE: Sign up for public comment to address the Board’s meeting conduct. Email the Board (see official agenda for contacts): ‘The 20-minute total time limit for public comment on agenda items is an unacceptable restriction on parental rights. We demand this arbitrary limit be removed to ensure all community members can be heard by their elected officials.’
💰 Impact: Parents’ Right to Speak
|
| NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Charter School Renewal Embeds ‘Whole Child’ Ideology
The presentation for the SIATech Charter School renewal (Item 6.A) is filled with ideological buzzwords. The school’s model is based on ‘Supporting the Whole Child’ and uses ‘MTSS Aligned academic, behavioral, social-emotional, wellness, and attendance supports.’ This language indicates a focus on social and emotional programming over core academics for at-risk students.
Recommended Action Plan
ASK HARD QUESTIONS: This is a public hearing. Sign up to speak on Item 6.A and ask the Board: ‘What percentage of SIATech’s curriculum is dedicated to social-emotional wellness versus core academic subjects like reading, math, and science? Parents want to see a focus on academic recovery for at-promise students.’
💰 Impact: Focus on Academics
|
| MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
District Disposing of Massive Stockpile of Obsolete iPads and Chromebooks
Under Item 14.F, the district is authorizing the disposal of hundreds of obsolete or worn-out iPads and Chromebooks. This action highlights the significant, ongoing cost of device-centric learning, which requires constant replacement cycles. This raises questions about the long-term financial sustainability and educational return on investment for these expensive 1:1 device programs.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Email the Board (see official agenda for contacts): ‘Regarding Item 14.F, what is the total cost of ownership for the devices being disposed of, and what is the budget for their replacement? Parents deserve to see a clear analysis showing these technology investments are more effective than non-digital resources before more money is spent.’
💰 Impact: Hidden Tech Costs
|
|
✅ Wins to Defend
Good moves worth showing up to support so they stick.
|
| Major Win (LEVEL 8) |
|
District Launches Review of Student Screen Time
The district is launching a ‘Tech Time Review,’ a district-wide examination of student screen time and the role of technology in the classroom. This review, detailed in Item 17.C, includes community forums and a ‘Family Campaign’ to partner with parents on technology use outside of school. This is a critical opportunity for parents to provide input and shape future district policy on screen time and digital curriculum.
How to Lock It In
PACK THE ROOM TO SUPPORT THIS: Show up to thank the Board for Item 17.C and get on the record supporting this review. Email the Board (see official agenda for contacts): ‘Thank you for launching the Tech Time Review. We look forward to participating to ensure new policies protect teacher-led instruction and limit unproductive screen time.’
✅ Why It Matters: Parental Involvement Needed
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
Moms for Liberty is the nation’s largest grassroots organization fighting for parental rights. Through national members and local chapters, our work ensures parents, not the government or radical activists, make the decisions concerning the upbringing and education of their children.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |