|
Heads up! Our parent watchdogs have scanned the upcoming agenda for COPIAGUE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT. We found 7 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Gender Ideology Embedded in Code of Conduct
The board is voting to approve a sweeping update to the Code of Conduct (Item 2.18) that formally defines “gender identity” and “gender expression” as protected categories. These definitions are then applied to policies on student rights, dress code, and prohibited conduct, creating a legal basis to punish students for “misgendering” and allowing biological boys to “express their gender identity” in girls’ private spaces and sports.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is a foundational change that injects radical gender theory into school rules. Email the Board of Education (contact info on district website): ‘I demand you vote NO on Item 2.18, the Code of Conduct policies. Do not force my child to affirm an ideology that violates their beliefs and safety.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Your Child’s Safety & Privacy
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Policy Allows Questioning Kids Without Parents
Policy 5300.55, up for a final vote, explicitly states school officials have “no obligation to contact a student’s parent prior to questioning the student.” The same policy creates a formal process for Child Protective Services (CPS) to enter the school and interview your child, bypassing you.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND A ‘NO’ VOTE: This policy severs your right to be present when your child is being questioned. Contact the Board of Education (see official agenda link): ‘Vote NO on Policy 5300.55. I do not consent to my child being interrogated by school officials or CPS without my knowledge and presence.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Your Right to Be Present
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 7) |
|
“Unaccompanied Youth” Policy Could Sideline Parents
Policy 5151, under review, contains provisions for “unaccompanied youth” who are not in the physical custody of a parent. This policy could be exploited to allow a child who runs away from home over a disagreement with parents (e.g., about gender transition) to be enrolled in school and receive services without parental consent, effectively terminating parental rights.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: This is a Second Policy Review, so now is the time to object. Contact the District Office (see official agenda link): ‘Regarding Policy 5151, what specific safeguards prevent the “unaccompanied youth” provision from being used to enroll students against their parents’ will in cases of family disputes over ideology?’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Loss of Custody
|
| ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
Attendance Policy Directly Linked to CPS Referrals
The proposed Comprehensive Attendance Policy (5100), currently under review, creates a direct pathway for the school to report families to Child Protective Services (CPS) for “educational neglect” based on attendance data. This weaponizes attendance records and puts families at risk of investigation for normal childhood illnesses or family circumstances.
Recommended Action Plan
PUSH BACK NOW: This is a Second Policy Review, so we can still influence it. Contact the District Office (see official agenda link): ‘Regarding Policy 5100, remove the language allowing staff to refer families to CPS for attendance issues. Do not turn teachers into CPS agents.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Risk of CPS Investigation
|
| 👀 MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
“Threat Assessment” Teams to Monitor Students
The new District-Wide School Safety Plan (Item 2.17) establishes “Behavioral Threat Assessment Teams” to identify and assess students who may be potential threats. These teams, which include outside “mental health and social service providers,” can create behavioral profiles on children without full parental consent or oversight, opening the door to ideological labeling and data collection.
Recommended Action Plan
OPT-OUT ALERT: Email the Board of Education (contact info on district website): ‘Regarding Item 2.17, what is the explicit, written parental consent process before a child is subjected to a Behavioral Threat Assessment? Who owns the data collected by outside mental health providers?’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Your Child’s Privacy
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 4) |
|
GSA (Gay Straight Alliance) Club Active in High School
An official report on extra-curricular activities (Item 3.8) confirms an active “GSA (Gay Straight Alliance)” club at the high school. These clubs often serve as a vehicle for promoting radical gender and sexual ideologies to students, frequently without parental knowledge or oversight of the materials being used.
Recommended Action Plan
Monitor: This is an existing club, not a new vote. Parents should ask the High School principal for a list of all materials and resources used by the GSA club advisor to ensure they are age-appropriate and non-ideological.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Undisclosed
|
|
✅ Wins to Defend
Good moves worth showing up to support so they stick.
|
| Major Win (LEVEL 7) |
|
WIN: Health Policy Stresses Abstinence, Has Opt-Out
The First Review of the AIDS Instruction policy (4315.1) is a win for parents. The policy explicitly states that instruction will stress “abstinence as the most effective and appropriate protection” and guarantees a parental right to opt their child out of the prevention portion of the curriculum with a written request.
How to Lock It In
SECURE THE WIN: Show up to thank the Board for this common-sense policy. Contact the District Office (see official agenda link): ‘Thank you for affirming parental rights and promoting abstinence in Policy 4315.1. Please ensure this language is protected and passed in the final version.’
✅ Why It Matters: Parental Rights Affirmed
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends. Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |