|
Heads up! Our parent watchdogs have scanned the upcoming agenda for Great Valley SD. We found 6 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 10) |
|
District Buys Explicit Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Platform
The board is purchasing additional licenses for ‘Everyday Speech,’ a platform explicitly designed to support Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). The agenda states it teaches ‘social skills, emotional regulation, and pragmatic communication,’ embedding therapeutic concepts directly into the school day, even for special education students.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is a direct pipeline for SEL into our schools. Contact the School Board (see the Official Agenda link for details) and attend the meeting. Tell them: ‘Vote NO on Item 9.10. We do not consent to psychological programming in the classroom. Focus on academics, not emotions.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Your Child’s Emotional Data
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Federal Funds for Social Studies ‘Professional Development’
The board plans to approve a $36,500 contract with Reisman Educational Consulting, LLC, paid for with federal Title IV funds, for ‘professional development’ and ‘curriculum review’ for social studies. Social studies is a primary channel for introducing ideological content, and this unvetted consultant is being paid with federal money that often has strings attached.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY: Contact the School Board (see the Official Agenda link for details) and demand Item 9.05 be pulled for a separate vote. Ask: ‘Who is Reisman Educational Consulting, and what is their approach to social studies? We will not approve a $36,500 contract for an unknown ideological consultant.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: $36,500 (Federal Strings Attached)
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Vague Title — Manual Review Required
The board is set to approve the 2026-2027 Student/Parent Handbook under item 12.02. This document is critical as it defines policies on everything from discipline to gender identity and pronoun usage, but the handbook itself is not attached to the agenda for public review before the vote.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: The Student/Parent Handbook must be made public before it is approved. Contact the District Office (see the Official Agenda link for details) and demand: ‘Post the full draft of the Student/Parent Handbook (Item 12.02) online immediately so parents can review it before the board votes.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Hidden Policy Changes
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
District Adopts ‘Portrait of a Graduate’ Program
The district is paying the CCIU up to $20,000 for a ‘Portrait of a Graduate’ program. These programs use vague language like ’21st-century skills’ to replace core academics with subjective, non-academic competencies aligned with Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and globalist agendas.
Recommended Action Plan
CHALLENGE THE BOARD: Contact the School Board (see the Official Agenda link for details): ‘Regarding Item 9.09, parents want graduates who are masters of reading, writing, and arithmetic, not subjective ‘competencies.’ Please reject this $20,000 initiative and refocus on academic excellence.’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: $20,000
|
| 🚨 HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Vague Title — Manual Review Required
Item 11.01 puts Policy 824, ‘Maintaining Appropriate Boundaries with Students,’ up for a final vote. Policies with this title can contain loopholes that allow staff to have private conversations with students about gender identity or other sensitive topics without parental knowledge. The attached policy document was not successfully extracted and must be reviewed manually.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file ‘824 Maintaining Appropriate Boundaries With Students.pdf’ attached to Item 11.01 in the Official Agenda (linked above) to confirm whether it contains language that undermines parental notification rights.
💰 Taxpayer Impact: Parental Exclusion
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 4) |
|
Taxpayer-Funded Lobbying Group Membership
The district is spending $3,250 to renew its membership in the PA Superintendent Study Council (PSSC). These professional organizations often engage in political lobbying that may run counter to parental rights.
Recommended Action Plan
ASK THE BOARD: Contact the District Office (see the Official Agenda link for details) and ask: ‘Regarding Item 9.04, what specific legislative positions does the PSSC advocate for? Will our tax dollars be used to lobby against parental rights bills?’
💰 Taxpayer Impact: $3,250
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends. Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |