|
Heads up! Our parent watchdogs have scanned the upcoming agenda for LIVERPOOL CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. We found 5 items that need your immediate attention before the vote.
| π¨ HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 9) |
|
Policy Allows Questioning Kids Without Parents
The proposed 2026-2027 Code of Conduct explicitly states that “school officials are not required to contact a studentβs parent(s) before questioning a student.” This policy formalizes the district’s ability to interrogate your child about alleged violations without your knowledge or presence.
Recommended Action Plan
PACK THE ROOM: This is a direct assault on parental rights. Email the Board of Education (see official agenda for contacts) and attend the meeting: ‘I demand you amend the Code of Conduct in Item 6.12 to require parental notification before any student is formally questioned by staff. We do not co-parent with the school district.’
π° Taxpayer Impact: Your Right to Counsel Your Child
|
| π¨ HIGH CONCERN (LEVEL 8) |
|
Gender Ideology Embedded in Discipline Code
The proposed Code of Conduct (Item 6.12) formally adds “gender identity” as a protected class. This means students can be disciplined for “harassment” or “bullying” based on accusations of using the wrong pronouns or disagreeing with gender ideology, turning subjective social issues into punishable offenses.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND NEUTRALITY: Email the Board of Education (see official agenda for contacts): ‘Regarding Item 6.12, the Code of Conduct must protect all students from bullying without becoming a tool to enforce contested ideologies like gender identity. Discipline should be based on objective actions, not subjective claims of offense.’
π° Taxpayer Impact: Weaponized Discipline
|
| β οΈ NEEDS REVIEW (LEVEL 6) |
|
New 9th Grade Book Features ‘Mature Themes’
The district is proposing to add the novel “Circe” to the 9th-grade honors English curriculum. The teacher’s rationale explicitly mentions “mature themes,” “gender roles,” and “complex social and ethical issues,” indicating content that requires parental review before it is approved for the classroom.
Recommended Action Plan
DEMAND REVIEW: Email the Board of Education (see official agenda for contacts): ‘Regarding Item 4.1, parents must have the opportunity to review *Circe* for mature content before it is added to the curriculum. Please table this proposal until a transparent parent review period is completed.’
π° Taxpayer Impact: Parental Curriculum Oversight
|
| π MONITOR (LEVEL 5) |
|
Vague Title β Manual Review Required
The board is set to discuss and approve a renewal for “Incident IQ” software under items 4.2 and 6.3, but has not provided the contract or any details in the provided documents. This software could be for simple IT tickets or could involve tracking student data and device usage, but without the documents, parents are left in the dark.
Recommended Action Plan
INVESTIGATE: Open the file attached in the Official Agenda (linked above) to confirm whether it contains sensitive policy changes.
π° Taxpayer Impact: Undisclosed
|
| ALERT (LEVEL 4) |
|
Attendance Tracking Disguised as ‘Incentive’
The district is accepting a donation of “Every Day Counts” stickers to “encourage” attendance. This phrase is often the first step in a “Chronic Absenteeism” tracking program, which can lead to increased school surveillance of families and even home visits.
Recommended Action Plan
ASK THE BOARD: Email the Board of Education (see official agenda for contacts): ‘Regarding the donation in item 2.5, what is the district’s policy on Chronic Absenteeism? What specific actions are triggered when a student’s attendance record is flagged, and are parents notified before any intervention like a home visit occurs?’
π° Taxpayer Impact: Family Privacy
|
|
|
“We do not co-parent with the government.”
We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends. Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Powered by Sentinel Engine |